Zamaneh Media
  • Latest Articles
  • Latest News
  • About Zamaneh Media
    • Exiled Media Report
    • Sponsors
    • Donate
    • Contact us
    • Legal
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
  • Latest Articles
  • Latest News
  • About Zamaneh Media
    • Exiled Media Report
    • Sponsors
    • Donate
    • Contact us
    • Legal
  • Advertise
No Result
View All Result
Zamaneh Media
No Result
View All Result

On Boycotting Philosophy Congress in Iran

by Zamaneh Media
November 21, 2010
in Uncategorized
Reading Time: 6 mins read
0
On Boycotting Philosophy Congress in Iran
Hossein Noushazar
Translated by:

Freida Afary

Translator’s Note: On November 10, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) canceled plans to hold its annual Congress for World Philosophy Day in Tehran. The Iranian government now claims that it will hold the event without UNESCO sponsorship. This congress, which was scheduled to be held on November 21-22, had been boycotted by a number of international philosophy scholars, including Jurgen Habermas. In addition, a group of Iranian philosophy scholars inside Iran and abroad had issued a Persian language "Call for Boycotting the Show Congress for World Philosophy in Tehran." Below are excerpts from an interview with Mohammad Reza Nikfar, an Iranian philosopher in Germany who was one of the signatories of this statement. This interview was conducted by Hossein Azarnoush of Radio Zamaneh on October 31, 2010. — Frieda Afary

Philosophy Is Not a Police Officer or Interrogator | A Conversation between Hossein Azarnoush and Mohammad Reza Nikfar about the first Congress for World Philosophy Day in Iran

Dr. Nikfar, this year, the Congress for World Philosophy Day is being held in Iran for the first time. Three statements have been issued so far to protest the convening of this congress. Why are Iranian intellectuals and philosophy graduates opposed to holding the congress in Iran?

Imagine if those who condemned Socrates to death, also established an academy of philosophy. Such an act would have been a bitter, satirical and shameful spectacle. That is the situation we face today. Those who have forced important thinkers out of Iran, those who have murdered, tortured and imprisoned many university students and professors, are holding a philosophy congress. Interestingly enough, the teaching of philosophy along with other fields in the humanities have been suspended at the universities. There is a strong effort to give philosophy an Islamic foundation.

What could be a greater affront to philosophy than a government’s effort to set the foundation, direction and framework for it and expect it to become the ideological police officer and interrogator of other fields of study?

Philosophy in our time is critical thought. Its role is to examine and evaluate the following: what we know, what is correct conduct, what is our human condition, how we articulate ourselves and our world, and what barriers stand in the way of socialization and dialogue…

Our first criticism is naturally directed at the power whose function is to suppress the truth. Philosophy questions everything. We are dealing with a regime whose leader claims that he is not accountable to the earthly world but to another place.

Philosophy as questioning stands in opposition to this regime. Philosophy is about doubt: doubting everything, including everything considered holy. This holy regime, which ultimately tries to use torture in prison to force its holiness on the doubting mind, is the enemy of philosophy.

Philosophy is wonder about the work of the world. From this vantage point, the Iranian regime is interesting for philosophy. How can so much shamelessness, deception and self-righteousness become synthesized? This is an interesting philosophical question. There needs to be a congress to discuss this subject.

One of the central issues of the congress is Islamic philosophy. If, as you correctly point out, philosophy is based on doubt, and jurisprudence is based on servitude and obedience, can we speak of "Islamic philosophy" as a synthesis of these two? In principle, is it correct to use the expression "Islamic philosophy?"

First, concerning the expression:

Islam is the name for an occurrence which once took place in Arabia. This event, along with the characters involved in it, can be and must be examined independent of its aftermath.

Islam is the name of a religion. A religion which for whatever reason represents a great mass of people, is something that transcends its original occurrence.

Finally, Islam is the name of a glorious culture or civilization which has been greatly influenced by that religion and the consequential events which have taken place in its name.

Islamic philosophy is a cultural occurrence and a cultural current which is Islamic in the third sense stated above. Its likes can be found in the world of Christianity and Judaism or in India.

A philosopher qua philosopher is not concerned with jurisprudence. Ibn Rushd [Averroes, 1126-1198 C.E.] had studied jurisprudence. However, his Imam and leader was not a jurisprudent who had founded a school of thought, but rather Aristotle. In a work entitled Fasl al-Maqal [On the Harmony of Religions and Philosophy] which he called the final word in the discussion on the relationship of religion to philosophy, he distinguished between the discourse of religion and the discourse of philosophy. The role of philosophy was rationalism, questioning and arguing. Religion, in contrast, was a discourse on the level of popular opinion.

The role of a philosopher who makes such a distinction is not to create a synthesis but to discern divisions. Ibn Rushd is the most discriminating philosopher of the world of Islam.

Another philosopher on a par with Ibn Rushd is Muhammad Ibn Zakariya al-Razi [865-925 C.E.] His works have been destroyed by the jurisprudents to prevent us from having access to them. He is not a Muslim philosopher. However, had his works survived, they would have been placed within the framework of Islamic Philosophy, which for the historian of philosophy, characterizes not a faith content but a period and a diverse culture.

The main accomplishment of Al-Farabi [872-950 C.E.] and Ibn Sina [Avicenna, 980-1037 C.E. ] was also not the creation of a synthesis. If a synthesis was created here and there, it was a synthesis of Greek philosophy with an understanding of God and creation and the relationship of God to the world and the subject of prophecy.

In any case, for the Islamic philosophers, the issue was not jurisprudence per se. In fact, if that were the issue, and if they had theorized about this subject, perhaps we would have been better off.

If you read Ibn Sina’s The Cure, you will see that in many cases, whenever he articulated a view, he concluded with critiquing the views of others. But who were these others? They were Greek philosophers whom Aristotle had also critiqued. In works such as The Cure, Islam and the real theoretical currents of the environment in which the book was written, were not really present. Nevertheless, such a work can be recognized as a work from the world of Islam.

Islamic philosophy is the philosophy of an age which has come to an end. If we consider Ibn Rushd’s death (1198 CE) to be the foundation, we are eight centuries distant from it. In its totality, this philosophical current belongs in a museum. It is significant from the standpoint of cultural studies and not for the sake of its philosophical content.

In order to understand the philosophical content of medieval Islamic philosophy, one must study the new philosophy. Without Kant, we cannot extract much from Ibn Sina. We will learn some expressions and classifications which will be of no use and with which we cannot know our current place in the world. However, with the aid of the new philosophy, we can find things here and there, which can appear attractive and relevant on the basis of a new interpretational background.

A living philosophy has to be relevant. We can no longer really relate intellectually to Aristotle’s Physics. His description of nature is important. However, the work as a whole is only useful for a historian of science. Aristotle’s Organon can still be read. However, more and better logical information can be gathered if we read newer books. The Metaphysics is interesting. The most interesting however are the Nicomachean Ethics and the Politics, which are still directly relevant to our situation. For instance, you will not find a single important book in defense of democracy which has ignored Aristotle’s very thought-provoking critique of democracy.

We can find a set of relevant works and pieces among the writings of Islamic philosophers. For instance, the discussion of the nature of reason, or the relationship of body and soul in the works of Ibn Sina and Ibn Rushd can be relevant to current debates. However, this subject is not something that the seminary of jurisprudence can tackle…

To what extent have you received support for the call to boycott the congress, of which you are a signatory.

The response has been great. Friends who are in touch with Iran say that the statement has received support from university students in the field of philosophy and other fields of the humanities, as well as independent scholars. These friends say that they have received e-mail messages from many university students who have expressed an interest in signing the statement with their own names and profiles.

The statement has also received much support abroad, as far as I know. Most major media have covered it. Many Iranian students and professors have added their names to the list of original signatories. International professors are also aware of this call.

The Iranian regime knows that international guests are aware [of this boycott]. That is why the official site for the congress does not include the list of international speakers. For the first time in the history of the Congress of World Philosophy Day, the names of some of the guests have been withheld until the last moment. Such a gathering does not deserve to be called a "congress of philosophy."

October 31, 2010

Related Posts

Dictaturship
Cartoon

Dictaturship

January 25, 2023
Keep Hanging!
Cartoon

Keep Hanging!

January 18, 2023
Sarina Saedi, a 15-year-old Teenager Killed by Severe Baton Blows in Sanandaj
Featured Items

Sarina Saedi, a 15-year-old Teenager Killed by Severe Baton Blows in Sanandaj

January 11, 2023
Topple the Regime
Cartoon

Topple the Regime

January 11, 2023
Iranian Uprising of “Woman, Life, Freedom”: Redeeming the Universals
Featured Items

Iranian Uprising of “Woman, Life, Freedom”: Redeeming the Universals

January 3, 2023
Workers in the "West Oil and Gas Production Company" located in Cheshmeh Khosh protest on 11 Aug 2022 as part of a nationwide protest of oil and gas workers in more than 60 production and support units in this sector.
Latest Articles

Download Zamaneh’s 22nd Labor Rights Report

January 1, 2023

RSS Iran in Other Media

  • Iran Crisis Update, January 29, 2023 - Critical Threats Project January 29, 2023
  • Drones target Iranian military site in Isfahan - Financial Times January 29, 2023
  • Israel strikes Iranian munitions facility with targeted drones - The Independent January 29, 2023
  • Iran says drone attack targets defense facility in Isfahan - The Washington Post January 29, 2023
  • Was Israel behind drone attack on Iran military installation? - Al Jazeera English January 29, 2023
  • EU to consider listing Iran's Revolutionary Guards as terrorists - Financial Times January 29, 2023
  • Israeli Drone Strike Behind Attack On Iran Defense Facility, US Outlet Reports - I24NEWS - i24NEWS January 29, 2023
  • Fast-paced 'Andy Warhol in Iran' packs real insight into an imaginary ... - Chicago Sun-Times January 29, 2023
  • Aircraft said to strike convoy of Iranian militia trucks on Syria-Iraq border - The Times of Israel January 29, 2023
  • Fear Of Iran's Disintegration Unreal, Opposition Figure Says - ایران اینترنشنال January 29, 2023
  • Unusual attack on Iran — a stern warning from Jerusalem? - Ynetnews January 29, 2023
  • Iran 'foils drone attack' on military facility in Isfahan - BBC January 29, 2023
  • Satellite images show no damage to kamikaze drone plant in Iran after alleged strike - Yahoo News January 29, 2023
  • Blinken says all options on table against Iran as he heads to Israel - The Jerusalem Post January 29, 2023
  • At Argentina junta memorial, Scholz evokes Iran protests - DW (English) January 29, 2023
  • Western tanks for Ukraine; Iranian protest update; Israeli democracy in danger? - Fareed Zakaria GPS - Podcast on ... - CNN January 29, 2023
  • Israel behind drone strike on Iranian military site: US officials - Al Arabiya English January 29, 2023
  • Iran says drone attack targets defense facility in Isfahan - The Associated Press - en Español January 29, 2023
  • Large Earthquake Hits Near Turkey-Iran Border; Several Reportedly Killed - Videos from The Weather Channel - The Weather Channel January 29, 2023
  • Israel Carried Out Latest Drone Attack On Iran Military Site - WSJ - ایران اینترنشنال January 29, 2023
Zamaneh Media

© 2020 Zamaneh Media

More information

  • Sponsors
  • Donate
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Legal

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Latest Articles
  • Latest News
  • About Zamaneh Media
    • Exiled Media Report
    • Sponsors
    • Donate
    • Contact us
    • Legal
  • Advertise

© 2020 Zamaneh Media